According to this article in the September 25th edition of the New England Journal of Medicine, alteplase improves the outcomes in stroke patients up to 4.5 hours after symptom onset. Previously, the “window” of effectiveness was only three hours. The clinical trial criteria are here.
The percentage of patients having a favorable outcome at 90 days in this study wasn’t huge, but was statistically significant - 52% of patients receiving alteplase had good outcomes compared with 45% of patients who received placebo. At the same time 27% of patients had some type of bleeding after receiving thrombolytics compared with only 17% of patients who had bleeding after receiving placebo. The rate of symptomatic bleeding in the brain was 2.4% for thrombolytics versus 0.2% for placebo.
So while you may have an overall improvement in your outcome at 90 days if you get the medication, more than 1 in 4 patients who receive the medication will have bleeding and 1 in 40 patients will have symptomatic bleeding.
Is it worth the risk?
In the editorial article accompanying the study, one of the study authors states that “one cannot help wondering why thrombolytic therapy has traveled such a long, difficult path to wider clinical use.”
I can help wondering.
Thrombolytics are one of the few things that physicians can give that will have an immediate and significant harm on patients. Sure, patients may occasionally have bad outcomes from allergic events or they may have undesirable side effects from some medications. But 2.4% of patients will have symptomatic bleeding in their brains when they get thrombolytics. Some of those patients will die.
I like to pose this scenario to my trainees: a patient presents to you 30 minutes after the onset of a left hemispheric stroke; how long do you have to initiate thrombolytic therapy?
The correct answer is 1 minute, not 2.5 hours, and ECASS III does not now justify an answer of 4 hours. From the moment the patient arrives at the door, every minute counts, and the only justifiable delays would be for performing brain imaging studies to exclude hemorrhage and for obtaining the results of a few simple laboratory tests. In fact, the very real peril of the ECASS III data is that some may take an even more leisurely approach to treating acute stroke. Nothing could be more wrong, for as we look back on the past decade of thrombolytic therapy for stroke, it is very clear that our focus must remain on the door-to-needle time. Every minute matters during a stroke.
So the choice is …
1. Let patient continue with the stroke symptoms they have already presented with and follow the doctrine of “primum non nocere.” After all, even this study shows that if doctors do nothing, 45% of the patients will get better on their own.
-or-
2. Give a medication that may improve clinical outcome in 7% more of the patients … at the risk of getting a bad outcome from the medication.
What would you choose?
Want a simple way to immediately expand the use of thrombolytic therapy?
If an On Call physician gets a CT report from a radiologist that says “no bleed,” the patient meets the criteria for thrombolytic therapy and doesn’t have any exclusion criteria, then the Physician cannot be held liable for any bad outcomes for giving thrombolytics.
There will still be some that philosophically disagree with giving patients a medication that could kill them. Nevertheless, there would be an instant spike in thrombolytic use. I guarantee it.
Powered by IP2Location.com
Thrombolytics in Acute Stroke? Time is brain
September 28, 2008
New Diabetic guideline for Canada
September 26, 2008
Hypertension Mega Trials
September 25, 2008
HIT again!
September 23, 2008
DRUMSTICKS
Metabolic Syndromes and CV mortality
Posted by arif at 12:13 AM View Comments
Labels: Cardiovascular Disease, Metabolic syndrome
Move to top of post.September 22, 2008
Statins Can do Everything?
Treatment with a statin resulted in about a 2-2.5 point drop in SBP and DBP. The treatment was stopped at 6 months, and the blood pressures returned to baseline by month 8 - further suggesting that this was a true effect.
Beatrice A. Golomb; Joel E. Dimsdale; Halbert L. White; Janis B. Ritchie; Michael H. Criqui
Reduction in Blood Pressure With Statins: Results From the UCSD Statin Study, a Randomized Trial
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(7):721-727.
Another Cause for Intermittent Jaundice
Elderly lady comes in with recurrent RUQ pain and jaundice. US shows gallstones and a dilated common bile duct. No stones seen in the CBD on MRCP. The GI consultant attempts an ERCP but the common duct cannot be cannulated secondary to a peri-ampullary diverticulum, noted to be full of food matter. I obtain the Upper GI barium study shown above.
Intermittent jaundice has been <>described in association with peri-ampullary duodenal diverticula, although it's quite rare. Options include formally excising the diverticulum versus simply bypassing the distal segment of the CBD with a biliary-enteric anastomosis.
Syndicated from Buckeye surgeon
New Hep B Recommendations
- <>The CDC just issued new testing recommendations for chronic Hep B virus infection.
Serologic testing for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is the primary way to identify persons with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Testing has been recommended previously for pregnant women, infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers, household contacts and sex partners of HBV-infected persons, persons born in countries with HBsAg prevalence of >8%, persons who are the source of blood or body fluid exposures that might warrant postexposure prophylaxis (e.g., needlestick injury to a health-care worker or sexual assault), and persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus.- This report updates and expands previous CDC guidelines for HBsAg testing and includes new recommendations for public health evaluation and management for chronically infected persons and their contacts. Routine testing for HBsAg now is recommended for additional populations with HBsAg prevalence of >2%: persons born in geographic regions with HBsAg prevalence of >2%, men who have sex with men, and injection-drug users.
- Implementation of these recommendations will require expertise and resources to integrate HBsAg screening in prevention and care settings serving populations recommended for HBsAg testing. This report is intended to serve as a resource for public health officials, organizations, and health-care professionals involved in the development, delivery, and evaluation of prevention and clinical services.
Endo Barrier for T2DM
Home Blood pressure Monitoring
September 19, 2008
A new pneumonia severity assessment tool? SMART-COP
Anemia of chronic disease
Ocular associations of DM
September 17, 2008
Does ‘ENHANCE’ Diminish Confidence in Ezetimibe?
September 15, 2008
Treat Glucose Early
September 13, 2008
How to survive a nuclear attack!!
September 12, 2008
Elderly and Hypertension- HYVET study
Elderly patients are at very high risk of Cardiovascular events and recently published HYVET looked at this issue.. Read this summary from Prof Zanchetti.
LCAT activity and Sub Clinical Atherosclerosis
Posted by arif at 12:02 PM View Comments
Labels: Cardiovascular Disease, Lipidology
Move to top of post.How To Read Chest X-Ray?
I have already posted on How to read Ches X-ray. This is a very nice presentation that i have syndicated. Enjoy the presentation and learn how to look at Chest X-rays.
Click on cxr...
My previous post on the same topic..
B12 deficiency - Dont miss this!
Eosinopenia and Sepsis
September 11, 2008
• Eosinopenia is a good diagnostic marker in distinguishing between noninfection and infection in newly admitted critically ill patients.
• Eosinopenia is a moderate marker in discriminating between SIRS and infection in newly admitted critically ill patients.
• Eosinopenia showed a higher sensitivity and specificity compared with CRP in the diagnosis of sepsis on admission to the ICU
• Eosinopenia may become a helpful clinical tool in ICU practices.
Read this article in critical care..
Leave That Ear Wax Alone
Ear wax is good. ("Cerumen is a beneficial, self-cleaning agent, with protective, lubricating (emollient), and antibacterial properties.")
Q-tips are bad. ("Inappropriate or harmful interventions are cotton-tipped swabs, oral jet irrigators, and ear candling.")
TIPS For Everyday Complaints
Statin use and Cancer
Previous research reported an association between on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and cancer in patients on statins. Authors reviewed data from 15 trials of 51,797 patients given statins and 45,043 given placebo. The patients were followed for an average of about 4.5 years, or 437,017 patient years of follow-up. There were 5,752 cancer cases. Researchers reported their findings in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Meta-regression analysis of the treatment arms of the studies showed an inverse association between treating LDL-C levels with statins and cancer, with 2.2 (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.6) fewer cancers per 1,000 person-years for every 10 mg/dL decrease in treating LDL (P= 0.006). The difference among control arms was 1.2 (95% CI, –0.2 to 2.7; P= 0.09). Meta-regression analysis showed that statins did not affect cancer risk for any levels of treatment.
The study also found a relationship between on-treatment LDL-C levels and cancer in patients not treated with statins.
Researchers concluded that statin-treated patients lower their LDL-C with no extra cancer risk.
Posted by arif at 9:46 AM View Comments
Labels: Cardiovascular Disease, Lipidology
Move to top of post.Cancer Scare and Vytorin
September 5, 2008
Seafood Allergy and radiologist!
Antifungals in ICU
eAverage Glucose
Treatment-failure gout: A moving target
September 3, 2008
Stalagmite Hips
From Aerthritis and Rheumatism
Zebra Lines
From Arthritis and Rheumatism
Cancer and Clot
Whether to undertake an arduous search for concealed cancer in patients with idiopathic VTE is a question that has never been more relevant. We have modern screening tests that detect with great regularity asymptomatic malignant conditions in otherwise healthy individuals, and we commonly cure early-stage cancer. However, screening for cancer has downsides: expense, potential for psychological and physical harm due to false-positive results, and complications of procedures instigated by true- and false-positive test results. Two questions are therefore pertinent: How often do we find cancer if we look hard enough in patients with VTE, and is the search worthwhile? The study by Carrier and colleagues nicely addresses the first question but does not answer the second.
Editorial in the same issue is worth reading.
Hypercholestrolemia and management
September 2, 2008
Tight Control Is Not Necessary in ICU
September 1, 2008
Against conventional wisdom, tight glucose control in critically ill patients has not reduced in-hospital death rates. Instead, according to a meta-analysis here, it increases the risk of hypoglycemic episodes.
With data pooled from 27 randomized trials involving 8,315 patients, the relative risk of hospital mortality was 0.93 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.03) for tight glucose control versus usual care, reported Renda Soylemez Wiener, M.D., M.P.H., of the VA Medical Center here, and colleagues in the Aug. 27 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The American Diabetes Association and several other medical societies have recommended tight glucose control for all critically ill patients, mainly on the basis of a 2001 study that found it reduced hospital mortality among critically ill surgical patients by one-third, said Dr. Wiener and colleagues.
"Subsequent large randomized controlled trials of tight glucose control in medical and mixed medical-surgical ICU settings, however, have failed to replicate this mortality benefit," the researchers said, prompting them to undertake the systematic review.
In an interview, Dr. Wiener said the meta-analysis results warrant a re-evaluation of recommendations of tight glucose control for all ICU patients.
Tight glucose control generally means seeking to keep blood glucose below 150 mg/dL with an insulin infusion during some or all of the ICU stay. Some guidelines, including those endorsed by the ADA, call for glucose levels of 80 to 110 mg/dL.
This study does not surprise me. Achieving tight control while providing intensive care does not have an obvious biologic theory. Of course, if glucose is your focus of attention, then you would be attracted to a glucose theory.
Generally patients in an ICU have so many different problems, that achieving balance seems more important than focusing too deeply on one factor.
HB A1c - Chaos to Harmony!
As HbA1c approaches middle age, this paper also describes how the test appears to be developing a mid-life crisis, as debate over how its results should be expressed seems likely to divide opinion among clinicians for some time to come.
Antibiotic Allergy
Backache
The Serotonin Syndrome
Read more
Current concepts in Serotonin Syndrome....